← Back to /admin

2026-04-24-topic-crossrefs.md

audits/2026-04-24-topic-crossrefs.md · 2,518 bytes

Audit — Topic Cross-References — 2026-04-24

Target. 10 posts (5 from topics/bitcoin-protocol.md, 5 from topics/law-governance.md).

Question. Are dual-listings honest, or are long posts getting cross-referenced by keyword drag-net?

Verdict. Mixed — 1 genuine over-crossref + 4 systematic under-crossrefs. The classifier under-represents the legitimate overlap between protocol and law.

Per-post results

Post Listed under bitcoin-protocol law-governance Drift?
Geographical Aspects of Cybercrime bp + lg tangential core-topic YES — bp drift
Blockchain and Digital Assets bp + lg major-theme major-theme no — justified
Letters of Indemnity (7.1K) bp core-topic core-topic no — under-tagged
Doctoral Study Components bp core-topic not-about-it no — correct
Nodes, Hash Rate, Signalling bp core-topic major-theme no — under-tagged
Creating a Smart Contract Registry lg major-theme core-topic no — under-tagged
Two steps forward, one step back lg tangential major-theme no — correct
Bitcoin as a Notary lg major-theme core-topic no — under-tagged

(Two additional posts omitted for space — see JSON.)

Findings

1. One drift: "Geographical Aspects of Cybercrime" is listed under bitcoin-protocol but is primarily a criminology/law paper with Bitcoin in one case-study section. Remove the bp cross-ref.

2. Four systematic under-crossrefs: Posts that substantively engage both pillars (Letters of Indemnity, Nodes/Hash Rate, Creating a Smart Contract Registry, Bitcoin as a Notary) are single-tagged. Wright's whole distinctive move IS fusing protocol mechanics with legal doctrine — the classifier systematically under-represents this.

3. One genuine dual-listing: "Blockchain and Digital Assets" legitimately spans both pillars.

Recommendations

Re-run on all 10 topic files quarterly.