Study Guide — The Works of Dr Craig Wright
For the serious student who wants to understand, continue, and build upon this body of work.
This guide covers 789 blog posts (904,261 words), 37 academic publications, 560 Satoshi Nakamoto writings, and the intellectual framework that connects them. It is organised as a progressive reading order: start at Tier 1 and work through each tier before moving to topic deep-dives.
Note: Tier 1 descriptions have been verified against the actual post content. Each "What it actually contains" section reflects what the post delivers, not what we wish it delivered.
How to Use This Guide
1. Tier 1 gives you the foundation in ~6 hours of reading. Do not skip it.
2. Tier 2 builds the full framework across all major themes (~20-30 hours).
3. Tier 3 provides deep dives by topic — read the ones relevant to your work.
4. The Satoshi Record should be read in parallel with Tiers 1-2 for context.
5. Posts are referenced as Title with word counts to help pace yourself.
Tier 1: The Foundation (Start Here)
These 10 pieces establish the core framework. Read them in this order.
1. The Bitcoin White Paper
- Source:
bitcoin.pdf/ satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org - Why first: Everything else is commentary on, extension of, or defence of this document. Wright's entire thesis is that the white paper defines Bitcoin completely and the protocol should never deviate from it. You need this cold before reading his interpretations.
2. "Bitcoin is all about incentives" (3,051 words)
- Post: bitcoin-blockchain-tech/bitcoin-is-all-about-incentives — 2018-11-06
- What it actually contains: Opens with the thesis that Bitcoin is an economic incentive system, not a technical curiosity. Argues miners have "skin in the game" unlike developers, and that this skin-in-the-game structure prevents protocol debasement. Quotes the white paper's own words on incentives extensively. Frames Bitcoin as "capitalist money designed to follow the vision of Mises and Hayek" -- sound money that cannot be debased. The second half applies the incentive framework to the specific context of the Nov 2018 BCH hash war (DSV opcode dispute, ABC vs SV chains), which is dated but illustrates the theory concretely.
- Why second: Wright's single most important claim is that Bitcoin is economics first, technology second. This post states that thesis directly and connects the white paper's incentive section to the broader argument about sound money. The hash war specifics are a worked example of the theory in action -- skim those if you want, but the framing is essential. Read this before the protocol-mechanics posts so you understand why each design choice exists.
3. "Solving Double-Spending" (4,604 words)
- Post: bitcoin-blockchain-tech/solving-double-spending — 2022-08-08
- What it actually contains: A heavily referenced academic-style essay that walks through the history of electronic cash systems and the double-spending problem. Cites Brands (1994), Ferguson (1994), Osipkov (2007), and others to show that peer-to-peer digital cash and observer networks existed before Bitcoin. Then identifies what made Bitcoin different: economically incentivised observers (miners) operating under a unilateral contract, maintaining complete traceability through privacy rather than anonymity. Includes a section on unilateral contracts (Wormser, 1916) explaining how the mining reward functions legally.
- Why third: This is Wright's most rigorous annotation of the white paper's core innovation. It is not a casual blog post -- it reads like a literature review with 30+ references. It shows how Bitcoin fits into the lineage of prior electronic cash systems and pinpoints exactly what was new. Essential for understanding that Bitcoin did not emerge from nothing.
4. "Simplified Payment Verification" (2,249 words)
- Post: bitcoin-blockchain-tech/simplified-payment-verification — 2019-10-09
- What it actually contains: Explains how SPV works technically: Alice stores her transaction data and Merkle paths, hands them to Bob when paying, and Bob validates by hashing the transaction and checking against block headers. Includes diagrams of the Merkle path validation process. Argues that SPV is what makes Bitcoin genuinely peer-to-peer (Alice sends directly to Bob, not through a node), and that without SPV, Bitcoin cannot scale. Lists the five components of a customer SPV wallet (TXs, keys, Merkle paths, minimal processing, optional block headers). Notes that SPV also enhances privacy because the merchant, not Alice, broadcasts to the network.
- Why fourth: SPV is the most misunderstood part of Bitcoin's design. Wright argues SPV was always the intended mode for ordinary users -- not running full nodes. This inverts the dominant BTC narrative and is foundational to understanding his position on scaling. The technical detail here is concrete and practical.
5. "A Discourse on Nodes" (3,302 words)
- Post: bitcoin-blockchain-tech/a-discourse-on-nodes — 2020-05-27
- What it actually contains: Defines what a node is using graph theory: nodes are miners who produce blocks, full stop. Non-mining systems are "clients" with no role in consensus. Demonstrates with network diagrams that client propagation is irrelevant -- after one hop to a single network node, the transaction reaches all miners in the next hop, making all client-to-client relay redundant. Quotes the original bitcoin.org website on IP-to-IP transactions. Explains that all coins were issued at launch and are distributed (not created) under a unilateral contract. Distinguishes Bitcoin nodes from overlay network nodes (storage, archive, etc). Ends by declaring UASF systems irrelevant.
- Why fifth: After understanding SPV (how users interact with the network), you need to understand what the network actually is. This post demolishes the "run your own node" ethos with a clear topological argument and draws the hard line: if you are not mining, you are not a node. The network diagrams make the small-world topology concrete.
6. "Why the Protocol Is Set" (2,002 words)
- Post: bitcoin-blockchain-tech/why-the-protocol-is-set — 2019-03-28
- What it actually contains: Uses a single extended scenario to make its case: Alice and Bob, grandparents in their 80s, create a multi-sig wallet with nLockTime transactions to leave bitcoin to their grandchildren when they turn 25. The scenario unfolds over decades -- new grandchildren, Bob's death, Alice's declining health, greedy children pressuring her. Then the key argument: if the protocol changes during this period (signature formats altered, opcodes rewritten), the locked transactions become invalid and the wealth is destroyed. Concludes that protocol immutability is required for Bitcoin to function as money and as a contracting system.
- Why sixth: The "set in stone" thesis. Rather than stating it abstractly, Wright proves it through a concrete human scenario where protocol changes destroy real wealth. This is the philosophical core of the BSV position. After understanding the technical architecture (posts 3-5), you now understand why it must never change.
7. "The False Lure of Anonymity" (3,898 words)
- Post: bitcoin-blockchain-tech/the-false-lure-of-anonymity — 2019-02-12
- What it actually contains: Opens with the history of his work on Blacknet (2005-2006) and the failure of DigiCash/eCash. Explains small-world network theory (Newman and Watts) and why Bitcoin's node topology must collapse into a small number of densely connected commercial miners with hop count under 3. Constructs a "thought experiment" around a hypothetical "AnonCoin" to show that any blockchain system's nodes are traceable and cannot hide -- proof-of-work requires stationary, high-bandwidth data centres subject to law. Argues Bitcoin was specifically designed to "ensure privacy and utterly destroy anonymity." Includes a section on why proof of stake fails (unstable, does not form small-world consensus). Notes that Bitcoin's economic design drew from Islamic jurisprudence (sukuk).
- Why seventh: This destroys the "Bitcoin is for anonymity" narrative with a structural argument, not just a moral one. The small-world network analysis shows why nodes cannot hide, and the AnonCoin thought experiment makes the argument accessible. This post also contains Wright's most direct statement on the privacy/anonymity distinction and introduces the legal enforceability of the system.
8. "Keys != Identity" (2,309 words)
- Post: law-regulation/keys-identity — 2020-08-08
- What it actually contains: A tightly argued legal essay on why cryptographic keys do not prove identity or ownership. Traces electronic signature law in the UK (2002 regulations, 2016 updates). Uses case law (Goodman v. J. Eban Limited, Morton v. Copeland, Lemayne v. Stanley) to show that a signature requires intention to authenticate, not mere possession of a signing instrument. Applies this to the Silk Road "Dread Pirate Roberts" defence to show it failed because Ulbricht could not provide extrinsic evidence of key transfer. Concludes that you own bitcoin when you have validly obtained it, not because you hold a key -- just as having a house key does not make you the owner of the house. Notes that Bitcoin is not encrypted and that PKI certification authorities remain necessary for large transactions.
- Why eighth: This is the legal foundation that connects Wright's technical design to the real-world legal system. After understanding how Bitcoin works technically (posts 3-7), you need to understand how it interfaces with law. The "keys are not identity" principle underpins everything Wright says about digital signatures, property rights, and why "code is law" is false. Without this, you will misunderstand his positions on ownership, theft, and enforcement.
9. "Forking and Passing Off" (6,009 words)
- Post: law-regulation/forking-and-passing-off — 2020-02-13
- What it actually contains: A detailed legal argument that BTC and BCH violated the original creator's database rights under UK law (Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988; Databases Regulations 1997). Distinguishes between forking software (permitted under MIT License) and copying the database (not covered by MIT License). Argues that Bitcoin's blockchain is a database with sui generis rights belonging to its maker. Explains the unilateral contract structure: miners are paid agents operating under fixed rules, not owners of the network. Cites Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company for the EULA structure. Distinguishes Bitcoin forks (where BTC copied the database and changed the protocol) from legitimate new cryptocurrencies (like Litecoin, which started fresh). Extensively footnoted with case law and statutory references.
- Why ninth: This is the legal thesis applied to Bitcoin's history. It connects the protocol-immutability argument (post 6) and the keys/identity argument (post 8) to a concrete legal claim. Whether you agree with the claim or not, understanding it is essential -- it is the framework through which Wright views every fork, every protocol change, and every competing chain.
10. "Commodity and security" (3,441 words)
- Post: bitcoin-blockchain-tech/commodity-and-security — 2018-11-19
- What it actually contains: Defines Bitcoin as a commodity based on the exchange of tokenised payments to miners for validated ledger entries. Explains mining as a contractual arrangement: users make offers (transactions with fees), miners accept by including them in blocks, and the competitive market sets a natural block-size equilibrium. Analyses miner liability through the lens of intermediary law -- backbone providers (miners) vs. endpoint wallets, and when miners face liability for enabling illicit transactions (draws parallels to telecom carriers vs. publishers). Discusses the halving schedule and the transition from subsidy to fee-based revenue. Argues that miners who incorporate opcodes designed to facilitate illegal activity (e.g. bucket shops) create liability for the entire mining partnership under common law.
- Why last in Tier 1: This post bridges economics, law, and protocol design into a unified framework. It answers "what IS bitcoin?" in legal-economic terms: a commodity, a contractual system, a liability framework. After reading the technical design (posts 3-5), the immutability thesis (post 6), the privacy architecture (post 7), and the legal foundations (posts 8-9), this post ties them together by explaining how the economic incentives, legal liability, and technical design create a single coherent system. It is the capstone that prepares you for the deeper Tier 2 material.
Tier 1 Total: ~30,305 words (~5-6 hours at careful reading pace)
Tier 2: The Full Framework (20-30 pieces per theme)
After Tier 1, read across these thematic groups. The order within each theme is progressive — earlier entries provide context for later ones.
Theme A: Protocol Design & Architecture
| # | Title | Words | Date | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Defining Protocol | 1,789 | 2023-03-23 | Formal definition of what "protocol" means |
| 2 | Fully Peer-to-Peer | 3,150 | 2019-09-18 | The peer-to-peer model — peers are miners, not users |
| 3 | Merkle Trees and SPV | 1,204 | 2019-06-26 | Technical mechanism behind Simplified Payment Verification |
| 4 | Peer-to-peer digital electronic cash | 1,023 | 2023-04-28 | Cash means transactions, not store of value |
| 5 | Nodes, Hash Rate, and Signalling | 5,068 | 2019-12-23 | What hash rate actually means for governance |
| 6 | Stable by design | 1,027 | 2022-02-07 | Why protocol stability is a feature, not a limitation |
| 7 | Constitutional Design Proposal | 2,862 | 2022-12-05 | How Bitcoin's rules function like a constitution |
| 8 | Bitcoin Mining: Consistency and Distribution | 2,862 | 2022-12-05 | Mining economics and network topology |
| 9 | The Right to Run a Node | 2,762 | 2023-01-09 | Node rights and responsibilities |
| 10 | Digital Signatures | 2,948 | 2020-02-19 | How signatures create legal evidence |
Theme B: Against Altcoins, Forks, and Protocol Changes
| # | Title | Words | Date | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The myth of forks | 5,944 | 2019-03-06 | Why forks don't create new Bitcoin |
| 2 | Why CLTV was a bad idea | 3,762 | 2019-01-08 | Specific critique of a BTC protocol change |
| 3 | Lightning is malleable… Steel is not | 3,299 | 2018-06-19 | Why Lightning Network is architecturally wrong |
| 4 | The Property Flaw of Lightning | 1,763 | 2021-02-15 | Legal problems with Lightning |
| 5 | Forks as a demerger, or a split as a copy? | 3,537 | 2019-03-19 | Legal framing of the BTC/BSV split |
| 6 | Why Silk Road was an abyss | 4,609 | 2019-06-27 | How darknet markets corrupted Bitcoin's purpose |
| 7 | The SegWit 15% attack | 2,169 | 2022-12-05 | Security vulnerability in SegWit |
| 8 | Application of UK Database Rights to Forking | 2,860 | 2022-12-05 | IP law applied to blockchain forks |
Theme C: Economics & Sound Money
| # | Title | Words | Date | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commodity and security | 3,441 | 2018-11-19 | Bitcoin as commodity + tokenised security |
| 2 | On Marxism and Imperialism | 8,178 | 2023-08-09 | Deep critique of Marxist economics |
| 3 | On the History of Neoliberalism | 6,994 | 2023-08-30 | History of free-market thought and its corruption |
| 4 | Book Review: How the World Became Rich | 7,177 | 2023-08-16 | Economic history and what creates prosperity |
| 5 | Micropayment Systems for Migrant Workers | 14,846 | 2022-12-05 | Detailed economic proposal using Bitcoin micropayments |
| 6 | The Asian currency crisis | 3,667 | 2023-01-18 | Monetary policy failure case study |
| 7 | Fintech and Visa vs Mastercard | 3,288 | 2023-05-31 | How Bitcoin competes with payment networks |
| 8 | Bitcoin and the costs of consumption | 3,551 | 2020-01-14 | Transaction costs and economic design |
| 9 | Banks versus markets | 3,409 | 2019-01-02 | Financial intermediation vs. direct exchange |
| 10 | Corporate Sustainability and Social Responsibility | 6,385 | 2022-12-05 | How honest money creates honest companies |
Theme D: Law, Property Rights, and Regulation
| # | Title | Words | Date | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Property Law in the Age of Bitcoin | 1,605 | 2021-08-30 | Property rights on blockchain |
| 2 | Evidence and law | 1,089 | 2022-12-05 | Digital signatures as legal evidence |
| 3 | The application, scope and limits of Letters of Indemnity in Bitcoin Contracts | 7,161 | 2022-12-05 | Detailed legal analysis of Bitcoin contracts |
| 4 | Taxing Crypto | 4,034 | 2019-12-10 | Tax implications and compliance |
| 5 | The Geography of Cybercrime | 5,459 | 2022-12-05 | Jurisdictional issues in digital crime |
| 6 | Looking the Other Way | 3,581 | 2019-08-28 | Regulatory failures and honest systems |
| 7 | Liability in Peer-to-Peer Networks | 526 | 2022-12-05 | Legal liability for network operators |
| 8 | Bitcoin Was Never Designed To Be Censorship-Resistant | 1,790 | 2022-12-05 | Compliance by design |
| 9 | Effective Enforcement in the Distributed Wild Web | 4,063 | 2022-12-05 | Law enforcement in decentralised systems |
Theme E: Computation & Smart Contracts
| # | Title | Words | Date | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Managing Blockchain Automata | 5,625 | 2018-10-21 | Umbrella document on distributed computation |
| 2 | Finite State Machines in Script | 2,785 | 2019-11-07 | How Script implements state machines |
| 3 | A codification scheme for state machines | 2,491 | 2022-12-05 | Formal encoding of state machines on chain |
| 4 | Creating a Smart Contract Registry | 3,005 | 2023-05-17 | Practical smart contract infrastructure |
| 5 | Clickwrap smart contracts | 1,693 | 2022-02-14 | Legal validity of on-chain contracts |
| 6 | Forex accounting in script | 1,542 | 2020-01-07 | Practical Script programming example |
| 7 | Infinite and Unbounded | 3,553 | 2021-09-14 | Turing completeness vs. resource bounds |
| 8 | Doctoral Study: Blockchain Technology | 3,511 | 2022-12-05 | Academic framework for blockchain study |
Theme F: Philosophy, Education, and Intellectual Foundations
| # | Title | Words | Date | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prometheus: Choosing to Be Bound | 3,895 | 2019-08-13 | On choosing constraint as virtue (philosophical core) |
| 2 | Satoshi and the Sophists | 3,141 | 2019-06-18 | Truth vs. rhetoric in Bitcoin discourse |
| 3 | Satoshi and Science | 3,072 | 2019-05-30 | Scientific method applied to Bitcoin |
| 4 | The Vision for Bitcoin | 1,847 | 2019-08-16 | The long-term vision statement |
| 5 | Virgil: The Aeneid | 4,774 | 2022-12-05 | Classical education and founding myths |
| 6 | The Odyssey: An Endless Story of Reaching Home | 4,742 | 2022-12-05 | Persistence and homecoming as metaphor |
| 7 | Personal Philosophy of Leadership | 2,440 | 2022-12-05 | How leadership relates to protocol design |
| 8 | Tulips and Other Myths | 3,797 | 2016-04-26 | Debunking common knowledge with history |
Theme G: Identity and Origins
| # | Title | Words | Date | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Satoshi Nakamoto | 2,205 | 2019-02-08 | The identity question directly addressed |
| 2 | Satoshi and the Byzantine Generals | 1,881 | 2019-04-18 | The Byzantine Generals Problem and its solution |
| 3 | The Genesis of Genesis | 2,490 | 2019-04-12 | The creation story |
| 4 | Genesis | 1,512 | 2019-03-25 | On the genesis block |
| 5 | From the Bygone Days of Yore — Part 1 | 3,512 | 2019-01-28 | Early history of Bitcoin development |
| 6 | Satoshi NEVER Posted on Bitcointalk | 756 | 2023-07-12 | Correcting the record on forum posts |
| 7 | Misinformation and the myth of Satoshi | 703 | 2023-07-12 | Against the mythologisation of pseudonymity |
| 8 | Bitcoin's privacy model | 1,841 | 2019-04-17 | How privacy was designed to work |
Tier 3: Topic Deep Dives
For each major topic area, these are the key pieces in reading order. Go deep where your work or interest demands it.
Deep Dive: Bitcoin as Electronic Cash (not "digital gold")
The most fundamental disagreement with the BTC narrative.
1. "Peer-to-peer digital electronic cash" — The definition
2. "Bitcoin and the costs of consumption" — Transaction cost economics
3. "Micropayment Systems for Migrant Workers" — Practical micropayment design
4. "Blockchain and Digital Assets" (9,415 words) — Copyright/patent micropayments
5. "Fintech and Visa vs Mastercard" — Competing with payment networks
6. "Taking money over the web using Bitcoin — the way it was designed" — E-commerce use case
Deep Dive: The Small World Network
How Bitcoin's network was designed to evolve.
1. "A Discourse on Nodes" — What nodes are
2. "Fully Peer-to-Peer" — The network model
3. "Nodes, Hash Rate, and Signalling" — Economic incentives
4. "The Right to Run a Node" — Rights and responsibilities
5. "Defining Scaling" — What scaling actually means
6. "Bitcoin Mining: Consistency and Distribution" — Mining economics
Deep Dive: Script and On-Chain Computation
For builders working with Bitcoin Script.
1. "Bitcoin: A Total Turing Machine" — Theoretical foundation
2. "Infinite and Unbounded" — Turing completeness explained properly
3. "Finite State Machines in Script" — Practical implementation
4. "Managing Blockchain Automata" — Platform architecture
5. "A codification scheme for state machines" — Formal encoding
6. "Forex accounting in script" — Worked example
7. "Learning Script" — Getting started
Deep Dive: Law and Bitcoin
For those working at the intersection of law and technology.
1. "The False Lure of Anonymity" — Privacy vs. anonymity
2. "Forking and Passing Off" — IP law and protocol changes
3. "Property Law in the Age of Bitcoin" — Property rights
4. "Evidence and law" — Digital signatures as evidence
5. "The application, scope and limits of Letters of Indemnity" — Contract law
6. "Taxing Crypto" — Tax compliance
7. "Effective Enforcement in the Distributed Wild Web" — Law enforcement
8. "The Geography of Cybercrime" — Jurisdiction
9. All posts in the "Papers Associated with Bitcoin and Related Topics in Law" series (Parts I-XXIV)
Deep Dive: Austrian Economics and Sound Money
For understanding the economic philosophy.
1. "Commodity and security" — Bitcoin's economic nature
2. "On Marxism and Imperialism" — What's wrong with the alternative
3. "On the History of Neoliberalism" — Free-market intellectual history
4. "Book Review: How the World Became Rich" — What creates prosperity
5. "The Asian currency crisis" — Monetary policy failure
6. "Banks versus markets" — Intermediation vs. direct exchange
7. "Myth and Reality, Security is Really About Economics" — Economics of security
The Satoshi Record — Parallel Reading
Read these alongside Tiers 1 and 2 for essential context.
Phase 1: The Announcement (read with Tier 1)
- Cryptography mailing list emails 1-6 (Oct-Nov 2008) — The original announcement and technical discussions with Hal Finney, James Donald, Ray Dillinger, and others. Pay attention to how each design decision is defended.
Phase 2: Early Development (read with Tier 2)
- Cryptography mailing list emails 7-18 (Nov 2008 - Mar 2009) — Technical refinements and the move to deployment.
- P2P Foundation posts 1-3 (Feb 2009) — The public announcement of Bitcoin v0.1.
Phase 3: The BitcoinTalk Era (read with Tier 3)
- BitcoinTalk posts 1-539 (Nov 2009 - Dec 2010) — The full record of Satoshi's public communication during Bitcoin's first years. Key themes:
- Technical decisions and their rationale
- Responses to early criticisms
- The gradual withdrawal from public participation
Key Satoshi Writings to Prioritise
- Email 1: "Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper" (Oct 31, 2008) — The original announcement
- Email 6: The longest email (1,035 words) — Detailed technical defense
- P2P Foundation Post 1: "Bitcoin open source implementation" (Feb 11, 2009)
- BitcoinTalk posts on: double-spending, proof-of-work, scaling, privacy model, alert system
Academic Publications
37 publications indexed from dblp.org. Key categories:
Security & Forensics (early career)
Wright's SANS/GIAC work and security research formed the practical foundation for Bitcoin's security model.
Blockchain Research (2015-present)
nChain-era academic publications formalising the arguments made in blog posts.
Recent arXiv Papers (2025)
18 papers published on arXiv in 2025 alone — the most productive academic year. These represent the latest formal expression of his thinking.
Full list: See academic-record/dblp-publications.md
Reading Strategy Notes
On Word Count and Depth
- Posts under 500 words are usually brief comments or announcements — scan them
- Posts 500-2000 words are focused arguments — read carefully
- Posts over 2000 words are essays — these are the core of the archive
- Posts over 5000 words are deep analyses — allow time, take notes
On the "Certificates" Category
119 posts in the certificates category with almost no word content — these are credential listings, not essays. Skip unless you need the specific certification details.
On the "Academics" Category
156 posts averaging only 203 words — these are mostly paper abstracts or brief academic notes. They serve as an index to his academic work rather than standalone reading.
On Repetition
Wright returns to the same themes repeatedly. This is not redundancy — each iteration adds nuance, responds to new developments, or addresses different objections. When you encounter a repeated theme, compare the treatment across posts to trace how the argument evolved.
On Cross-Disciplinary Reading
A single Wright post may reference Hayek, Shannon, a Supreme Court case, and a Python script in the same paragraph. The study guide groups by primary theme, but real understanding comes from seeing the connections across themes. After completing Tier 2, re-read Tier 1 — you'll see things you missed.
Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Blog posts in archive | 789 |
| Blog total words | 904,261 |
| Posts > 500 words (substantial) | 479 |
| Posts > 2000 words (essays) | 147 |
| Posts > 5000 words (deep analyses) | 17 |
| Satoshi emails | 18 |
| Satoshi forum posts | 542 |
| Satoshi total words | 47,583 |
| Academic publications (dblp) | 37 |
| Blog categories | 12 |
| Study guide Tier 1 words | ~30,305 |
| Study guide Tier 2 posts | ~70 |
Generated from the Craig Wright Archive. Last updated: 2026-03-10.